<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.independentreview.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Litchfield Independent Review - Supporters propose $2.5 million aquatic facility - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.independentreview.net/news/around-litchfield/supporters-propose-2-5-million-aquatic-facility-2729</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Supporters propose $2.5 million aquatic facility&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Supporters propose $2.5 million aquatic facility</title>
 <link>http://www.independentreview.net/news/around-litchfield/supporters-propose-2-5-million-aquatic-facility-2729</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
A proposed outdoor swimming pool and water park in Litchfield would cost about $2.5 million.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Now, supporters and City Council members just have to figure out if the city can afford it.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Litchfield Swimming Pool Steering Committee members and representatives of USAquatics Inc. presented their Aquatic Facility Feasibility Study to the City Council March 17.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The City Council did not act on the report, instead responding to it with questions — about cost, availability of lifeguards, and whether it should be an indoor or outdoor facility.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.independentreview.net/news/around-litchfield/supporters-propose-2-5-million-aquatic-facility-2729&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.independentreview.net/news/around-litchfield/supporters-propose-2-5-million-aquatic-facility-2729#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.independentreview.net/news/around-litchfield">Around Litchfield</category>
 <category domain="http://www.independentreview.net/news/litchfield-city-council">Litchfield City Council</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:48:23 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Brent Schacherer</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2729 at http://www.independentreview.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
